<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Biofeedback setting 1 working and slightly better than anticipated</title>
	<link>http://britishengineeringsystems.com/2008/09/12/biofeedback-setting-1-working-and-slightly-better-than-anticipated/</link>
	<description>Blog of an Engineer (amongst other things)</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 10:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://britishengineeringsystems.com/2008/09/12/biofeedback-setting-1-working-and-slightly-better-than-anticipated/#comment-1343</link>
		<author>peter</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 21:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://britishengineeringsystems.com/2008/09/12/biofeedback-setting-1-working-and-slightly-better-than-anticipated/#comment-1343</guid>
		<description>I was going to have a go at a low pass filtered random system where the random number only dictates how big and in which direction the next jump will be. If the max size of a jump is significantly smaller than the range of outputs then the device will effectively wander up and down the range.
i like the "lucky dip" idea.

There are all sorts of other possibilities but this is why i have a bootloader so that new patterns and functions can be added at a later date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to have a go at a low pass filtered random system where the random number only dictates how big and in which direction the next jump will be. If the max size of a jump is significantly smaller than the range of outputs then the device will effectively wander up and down the range.<br />
i like the &#8220;lucky dip&#8221; idea.</p>
<p>There are all sorts of other possibilities but this is why i have a bootloader so that new patterns and functions can be added at a later date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://britishengineeringsystems.com/2008/09/12/biofeedback-setting-1-working-and-slightly-better-than-anticipated/#comment-1340</link>
		<author>Larry</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 20:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://britishengineeringsystems.com/2008/09/12/biofeedback-setting-1-working-and-slightly-better-than-anticipated/#comment-1340</guid>
		<description>Peter,

Congrats on getting your system working.  One aspect I'm interested in for such toys is using "limited randomness" as part of such a toy.  By limited randomness, I mean that the response isn't totally random, but neither is it so constant (or such a clear pattern) that a user can get entirely used to it.  So (for example) the duty cycle might be random, but only within a range that's chosen -- for that stage in use -- pleasurable and/or maddeningly teasing.  

Another possible use of randomness is to have your CPU "roll the dice" at the beginning, and decide which (of several pre-programmed) scenarios it will run *without* telling the subject which one it has selected.  So the subject doesn't know whether they're getting a quicky or a long-slow tantalization.

A last note: if you're not happy with your pressure sensor, here's a company that makes amazingly sensitive (and pre-amplified) ones: http://www.allsensors.com/
-- for example, http://www.allsensors.com/datasheets/commercial_temp/DS-0032_RevA.pdf 
measures fractional inches H2O -- thus even smaller fraction of a PSI.  (Sorry for the barbarian units.)  

HTH,

Larry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter,</p>
<p>Congrats on getting your system working.  One aspect I&#8217;m interested in for such toys is using &#8220;limited randomness&#8221; as part of such a toy.  By limited randomness, I mean that the response isn&#8217;t totally random, but neither is it so constant (or such a clear pattern) that a user can get entirely used to it.  So (for example) the duty cycle might be random, but only within a range that&#8217;s chosen &#8212; for that stage in use &#8212; pleasurable and/or maddeningly teasing.  </p>
<p>Another possible use of randomness is to have your CPU &#8220;roll the dice&#8221; at the beginning, and decide which (of several pre-programmed) scenarios it will run *without* telling the subject which one it has selected.  So the subject doesn&#8217;t know whether they&#8217;re getting a quicky or a long-slow tantalization.</p>
<p>A last note: if you&#8217;re not happy with your pressure sensor, here&#8217;s a company that makes amazingly sensitive (and pre-amplified) ones: <a href="http://www.allsensors.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.allsensors.com/</a><br />
&#8211; for example, <a href="http://www.allsensors.com/datasheets/commercial_temp/DS-0032_RevA.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.allsensors.com/datasheets/commercial_temp/DS-0032_RevA.pdf</a><br />
measures fractional inches H2O &#8212; thus even smaller fraction of a PSI.  (Sorry for the barbarian units.)  </p>
<p>HTH,</p>
<p>Larry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

